USAID reporting, from the data rather than from memory.
Karagem ships the PPR layout as a report template. The indicator table is built from your live data, and every indicator more than ten per cent off its target arrives with a deviation narrative already drafted from what the numbers show.
In the productBuilt in. USAID is one of four donor templates in the product today.Updated 2026-10-14
What the PPR actually asks for
An indicator table with baseline, target, actual and per cent achieved, disaggregated where the indicator requires it — and, for anything off by more than ten per cent, a written explanation of why.
The table is the easy half. The deviation narratives are what turn a reporting week into a reporting fortnight, because each one needs somebody to remember what happened in a quarter that ended six weeks ago.
The deviation narrative, drafted rather than blank
Karagem knows the shape of the miss — how far off, in which direction, against how much of the programme calendar — so it drafts the sentence that states it, and you write the part only a person knows: the cause, and what changes.
"Delays in procurement" is a category, not a cause. "Seed arrived six weeks after the planting window, so adoption for the long rains is lost; revised expectation 2,100 by December" is a cause, a consequence and a number, and it is the difference between a reviewer accepting the explanation and asking three more questions.
And the data quality assessment behind it
USAID assesses data quality on five dimensions — validity, reliability, precision, integrity, timeliness — and the assessment is about provenance, which cannot be added afterwards.
Because every reported figure traces to an approved submission, a person, a place and a form version, the DQA becomes an export rather than a fortnight of reconstruction.
A worked PPR row
Take an indicator: "Number of farmers adopting improved seed", baseline 0, annual target 3,000. The field team’s submissions put the actual at 2,050 by the end of Q3 — 68 per cent achieved with 75 per cent of the year gone, which is a 21 per cent shortfall against target and over the ten per cent line.
The PPR row Karagem produces reads: baseline 0, target 3,000, actual 2,050, 68.3%, disaggregated 1,180 women / 870 men across three counties — and a drafted deviation opening: "Achievement is 21% below target with one quarter remaining." You replace the draft’s second sentence with the cause and the correction; the arithmetic, the disaggregation and the trace to approved submissions are already done.