Karagem

Live read-only view · no sign-in · shared by the programme team

Try it on your own data

Live program results · active

Resilient Smallholders 2026

Lakeside Agricultural Trust · for Sample funder

1 Jan 2026 → 31 Dec 2026 · 67% elapsed Kisumu, Homa Bay, Siaya, Migori, Kisii

A three-year resilience programme with smallholder households across five counties in western Kenya: drought-tolerant seed, post-harvest storage, farmer group strengthening and market linkage.

Farmers reached

4,820

80% of 6,000 target · 47% women

Trainings held

96

120 sessions scheduled

Attendance

3,418

79% of capacity

Indicators on track

57%

7 indicators tracked

Survey responses

5,140

4,731 verified on the collector's device · 5,140 sealed against change

Budget spent

64%

KES 26.90M of KES 42.00M

Results framework — targets vs actuals

Status compares progress to the share of the program period that has elapsed.

Households adopting drought-tolerant seed2,310 / 3,000 households73%On track

Last recorded 26 Aug 2026

Average maize yield per acre11.2 / 14 bags53%On track

Last recorded 20 Aug 2026

Women in farmer group leadership27 / 40 %41%At risk

Last recorded 12 Aug 2026

Post-harvest loss21 / 12 %50%At risk

Last recorded 29 Jul 2026

Farmers with market contracts480 / 1,500 farmers32%Off track

Last recorded 22 Jul 2026

Trainings delivered96 / 120 sessions80%On track

Last recorded 29 Aug 2026

Savings group members1,910 / 2,400 members73%On track

Last recorded 23 Aug 2026

64%

Budget burn

KES 26.90M spent of KES 42.00M

67% of the program period elapsed.

Coverage

farmers sessions

Last updated 01/09/2026, 05:00:00 · page generated 01/09/2026, 09:00:00. Published by the program team on Eagmark Agri-Hub and revocable at any time. Aggregates only — no beneficiary records are shown.

What you are looking at

This is the page a funder opens. Not a picture of it — the same component, on the same interface, that a real share link renders. Every figure comes from the demo programme the rest of the site uses, so nothing here has been arranged to flatter.

What is missing is the point. There are no beneficiary names, no household records and no coordinates precise enough to find anyone. A donor link carries aggregates and indicator progress and nothing else, and that is a property of the interface rather than a promise in a policy — the data simply is not passed.

On a real programme the link is revocable, so a funder relationship that ends takes the access with it, and the numbers update as the field team submits rather than when somebody remembers to send a spreadsheet.